<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Superior Court Middlesex County Archives - Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bmmplaw.com/category/superior-court/superior-court-middlesex-county-superior-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bmmplaw.com/category/superior-court/superior-court-middlesex-county-superior-court/</link>
	<description>Attorneys At Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 May 2022 17:14:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>NY Dram Shop claims against Copacabana Dismissed</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2022/ny-dram-shop-claims-against-copacabana-dismissed/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ny-dram-shop-claims-against-copacabana-dismissed</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angelo Bongiorno]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2022 17:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Superior Court Middlesex County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bmpnylaw.com/?p=1684</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Angelo J. Bongiorno&#8217;s motion to Dismiss all claims against the Copacabana defendants was Granted by Judge Lisa Headley of Supreme Court, New York County after oral arguments.  The plaintiff, a pedestrian, was injured when struck by a car driven by co-defendant, Trotman, who claimed that he became intoxicated at Copacabana.  Trotman testified that several days [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2022/ny-dram-shop-claims-against-copacabana-dismissed/">NY Dram Shop claims against Copacabana Dismissed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angelo J. Bongiorno&#8217;s motion to Dismiss all claims against the Copacabana defendants was Granted by Judge Lisa Headley of Supreme Court, New York County after oral arguments.  The plaintiff, a pedestrian, was injured when struck by a car driven by co-defendant, Trotman, who claimed that he became intoxicated at Copacabana.  Trotman testified that several days before the accident, he purchased a $300 birthday package, which came with 2 bottles of alcohol and admission for 6 people.  Trotman poured himself drinks.  He did not buy any additional alcohol on the night in question.  Non-party witnesses that were celebrating with Trotman that night testified that Trotman was visibly intoxicated when someone brought an additional bottle to the table after 1:00 am, but they did not know who brought it or what was in the bottle.   Judge Headley agreed with our arguments that counsel for plaintiff&#8217;s arguments that the testimonies reveal that additional alcohol was served by Copacabana staff after Trotman was visibly intoxicated was mere speculation and found that plaintiff failed to establish that Copacabana served alcohol to Trotman while he was visibly intoxicated.  Denenberg v. 268 West 47th Rest., Inc., individually and d/b/a Copacabana, and 760 8th Ave. Rest., Inc., individually and d/b/a Copacabana, et al.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2022/ny-dram-shop-claims-against-copacabana-dismissed/">NY Dram Shop claims against Copacabana Dismissed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>BMMP&#8217;s William J. Mitchell Wins Summary Judgment in New Jersey Superior Court on Insurable Interest/Anti-Assignment Case</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2021/bmmps-william-j-mitchell-wins-summary-judgment-in-new-jersey-superior-court-on-insurable-interest-anti-assignment-case/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bmmps-william-j-mitchell-wins-summary-judgment-in-new-jersey-superior-court-on-insurable-interest-anti-assignment-case</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BMMP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Superior Court Middlesex County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bmpnylaw.com/?p=1208</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In Jian Shen v. Hyundai Marine &#38; Fire Ins. Co., plaintiff sought insurance coverage after transferring all of her right, title, and interest in real property to an LLC.  After the property incurred fire damage, plaintiff filed suit against her homeowner&#8217;s insurer, claiming she never lost her insurable interest, to hold otherwise was against public [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2021/bmmps-william-j-mitchell-wins-summary-judgment-in-new-jersey-superior-court-on-insurable-interest-anti-assignment-case/">BMMP&#8217;s William J. Mitchell Wins Summary Judgment in New Jersey Superior Court on Insurable Interest/Anti-Assignment Case</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="1208" class="elementor elementor-1208">
						<section class="elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-7ac47f33 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default" data-id="7ac47f33" data-element_type="section">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-5899e709" data-id="5899e709" data-element_type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-1d1b25b0 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="1d1b25b0" data-element_type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>In <em>Jian Shen v. Hyundai Marine &amp; Fire Ins. Co</em>., plaintiff sought insurance coverage after transferring all of her right, title, and interest in real property to an LLC.  After the property incurred fire damage, plaintiff filed suit against her homeowner&#8217;s insurer, claiming she never lost her insurable interest, to hold otherwise was against public policy, and therefore she was entitled to coverage.  On behalf of the insurer, BMMP&#8217;s William J. Mitchell supervised the case and argued the motions before Judge Christopher D. Rafano of the New Jersey Superior Court, Middlesex County.  The court granted Hyundai&#8217;s motion to dismiss the complaint with prejudice, finding the plaintiff lost her insurable interest and violated the anti-assignment clause of the policy and pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.19.</p><p><a href="https://bmmplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Order-Granting-Summary-Judgment.pdf">Read the full text of the Decision here</a></p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2021/bmmps-william-j-mitchell-wins-summary-judgment-in-new-jersey-superior-court-on-insurable-interest-anti-assignment-case/">BMMP&#8217;s William J. Mitchell Wins Summary Judgment in New Jersey Superior Court on Insurable Interest/Anti-Assignment Case</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>BMMP&#8217;s Aigul Sarvarova &#038; Angelo Bongiorno win summary judgment</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2019/bmps-aigul-sarvarova-angelo-bongiorno-win-summary-judgment/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bmps-aigul-sarvarova-angelo-bongiorno-win-summary-judgment</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Palmieri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2019 12:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Superior Court Middlesex County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bmpnylaw.com/?p=952</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>M.L., etc. v. City of New York, et al., Successful Summary Judgment 2019 Aigul E. Sarvarova and Angelo J. Bongiorno were successful in obtaining summary judgment in the case of M.L., etc. v. City of New York, et al., Queens County, Justice Ulysses B. Leverett.  The plaintiff, a 3 ½ year-old infant at the time [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2019/bmps-aigul-sarvarova-angelo-bongiorno-win-summary-judgment/">BMMP&#8217;s Aigul Sarvarova &#038; Angelo Bongiorno win summary judgment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M.L., etc. v. City of New York, et al., Successful Summary Judgment 2019</p>
<p>Aigul E. Sarvarova and Angelo J. Bongiorno were successful in obtaining summary judgment in the case of M.L., etc. v. City of New York, et al., Queens County, Justice Ulysses B. Leverett.  The plaintiff, a 3 ½ year-old infant at the time of the alleged accident, was a passenger on a school bus that was involved in a collision with another motor vehicle. The infant plaintiff, by his mother and natural guardian, brought an action claiming personal injuries, naming The City of New York, New York City Department of Education, the respective drivers, the school bus company, and the school that he attended at the time, as defendants.  Plaintiff alleged <em>inter alia </em>that the City defendants were negligent in the maintenance of the stop sign at the intersection where the subject accident took place.  In particular, the plaintiff claimed that there was a missing stop sign at the subject intersection, which caused the alleged accident.  Upon conclusion of discovery, the City Defendants moved for summary judgment arguing <em>inter alia</em> that they lacked prior notice of the allegedly missing stop sign.  That motion was Denied by Judge Leverett, and The City defendants moved to reargue.  At oral arguments before Judge Leverett, we were able to demonstrate to Judge Leverett that he overlooked the evidence showing that after receiving notice, the City replaced the stop sign about two weeks before the accident and did not receive notice of the stop sign missing again until after the accident had occurred.  After re-evaluation of the evidence that we presented, Judge Leverett Reversed his prior decision and Granted the City defendants’ motion for summary judgment, holding that the evidence showed that the City defendants did not have notice of the allegedly missing stop sign prior to the subject accident.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2019/bmps-aigul-sarvarova-angelo-bongiorno-win-summary-judgment/">BMMP&#8217;s Aigul Sarvarova &#038; Angelo Bongiorno win summary judgment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>M.P., infant v. Mineola Union Free School District, Supreme Court, Nassau County 2019</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2019/m-p-infant-v-mineola-union-free-school-district-supreme-court-nassau-county-2019/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=m-p-infant-v-mineola-union-free-school-district-supreme-court-nassau-county-2019</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Palmieri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Superior Court Middlesex County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bmpnylaw.com/?p=946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict after a jury trial in Supreme Court, Nassau County before Justice Steinman in the case of M.P., infant v. Mineola UFSD . The case involved a fourth-grade student at Jackson Ave Elementary School who was injured during recess. On the date of the accident the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2019/m-p-infant-v-mineola-union-free-school-district-supreme-court-nassau-county-2019/">M.P., infant v. Mineola Union Free School District, Supreme Court, Nassau County 2019</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict after a jury trial in Supreme Court, Nassau County before Justice Steinman in the case of M.P., infant v. Mineola UFSD .</p>
<p>The case involved a fourth-grade student at Jackson Ave Elementary School who was injured during recess.  On the date of the accident the infant plaintiff and seven friends were playing touch football in the field adjacent to the playground equipment.</p>
<p>The infant plaintiff and his friends were advised by the recess aides as to the accepted boundaries to be used for the football field to ensure that the boys did not play too close to the playground equipment.  Several times during the school year the boys attempted to extend the boundaries of the football field and were repeatedly warned by the recess aides to keep the football game limited to the accepted boundaries and to be sure to stay back from the playground area.  The boys would obey the instructions of the recess aides for a period of time and then attempt to  extend the boundaries of the field again.</p>
<p>The infant plaintiff testified that on the day of the accident the boys extended the boundaries of the football field even though they knew they were not supposed to.  This extension of the field caused the football game to be played immediately adjacent to the playground area.  During the football game, the infant plaintiff went out for a long pass which went beyond the back of the endzone and ran into a piece of playground equipment sustaining significant dental injuries.</p>
<p>The Plaintiff produced for trial testimony the infant plaintiff, his mother and an expert in physical education and recess.  The two recess aides that were present on the date of the accident testified as well.</p>
<p>The jury returned a unanimous verdict of no negligence on behalf of the School District.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2019/m-p-infant-v-mineola-union-free-school-district-supreme-court-nassau-county-2019/">M.P., infant v. Mineola Union Free School District, Supreme Court, Nassau County 2019</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>S.B. infant, v. Roosevelt UFSD, Supreme Court Nassau County 2017</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2017/s-b-infant-v-roosevelt-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2017/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=s-b-infant-v-roosevelt-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2017</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmp-law-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 16:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Superior Court Middlesex County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topofnyc.com/?p=499</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict in the case of S.B. infant, v. Roosevelt UFSD, Supreme Court Nassau County 2017- Defense Verdict &#8211;  At the time of the accident the plaintiff was a high school junior and a member of the Roosevelt girls’ varsity softball team.  At that time there was [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2017/s-b-infant-v-roosevelt-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2017/">S.B. infant, v. Roosevelt UFSD, Supreme Court Nassau County 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict in the case of S.B. infant, v. Roosevelt UFSD, Supreme Court Nassau County 2017- Defense Verdict &#8211;  At the time of the accident the plaintiff was a high school junior and a member of the Roosevelt girls’ varsity softball team.  At that time there was ongoing construction and renovation at the Roosevelt High School causing the team to practice at a Uniondale elementary school.  This field was just an area of grass that looked like at one time was a little league diamond as it did have a backstop.  However, there was no longer an infield or base paths as it was entirely grown over with grass.  Both the plaintiff and the coach described the grass field as bumpy and uneven. At the first practice at the Uniondale field the coach decided to conduct base running drills.  The drill consisted of the girls running from where home plate would be, rounding the area where first base would be and then sliding feet first into an area where second base would be when the coach yelled down. The plaintiff was the first player to perform the drill and when she attempted to slide into second base her right cleat got caught in the grass causing her to fracture her ankle. It was the allegation of the plaintiff that the act of sliding in the grass unreasonably increased the plaintiff&#8217;s risk of injury as sliding feet first in the grass into a base is not a normal part of the game of softball and therefore not a risk that a player assumes in her participation in the sport. The jury returned a defense verdict finding that the Plaintiff assumed the risk of injury by her voluntary participation in the sport of softball.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2017/s-b-infant-v-roosevelt-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2017/">S.B. infant, v. Roosevelt UFSD, Supreme Court Nassau County 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strobl v. Kellerman, Supreme Court Nassau County 2016</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2016/strobl-v-kellerman-supreme-court-nassau-county-2016/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=strobl-v-kellerman-supreme-court-nassau-county-2016</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmp-law-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 16:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Superior Court Middlesex County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topofnyc.com/?p=497</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict in the case of Strobl v. Kellerman, Supreme Court Nassau County 2016 – Defense Verdict.  The Plaintiff was a 67-yr. old female who was a front seat passenger in a vehicle that was rear ended by on the I-95.  Liability was conceded and the trial [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2016/strobl-v-kellerman-supreme-court-nassau-county-2016/">Strobl v. Kellerman, Supreme Court Nassau County 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict in the case of Strobl v. Kellerman, Supreme Court Nassau County 2016 – Defense Verdict.  The Plaintiff was a 67-yr. old female who was a front seat passenger in a vehicle that was rear ended by on the I-95.  Liability was conceded and the trial was on damages only.</p>
<p>The Plaintiff alleged that as a result of the accident she had to undergo a left total knee replacement.  The Plaintiff  was taken by ambulance from the accident to the hospital where she made complaints of bilateral knee pain.  The plaintiff treated for PT for a few months then had an unexplained 14-month gap in treatment with her orthopedist.  After beginning to treat with her orthopedist again, the Plaintiff waited another 22 months before having the knee replacement surgery.</p>
<p>The Plaintiff was morbidly obese and alleged that the 22-month gap was as a result of her having gastric bypass surgery to lose weight prior to having the knee replaced.  However, this need to lose weight prior to the surgery was not documented anywhere in her medical records.</p>
<p>The x-rays and MRI&#8217;s conducted on plaintiff&#8217;s knee showed degeneration which was also noted in the Operative Report.</p>
<p>The argument was set forth to the jury that the knee surgery was caused by a progressive deterioration as a result of her excessive weight during her lifetime coupled with her 25-yr. career as a postal worker.</p>
<p>The jury found that the knee surgery was not causally related to the accident.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2016/strobl-v-kellerman-supreme-court-nassau-county-2016/">Strobl v. Kellerman, Supreme Court Nassau County 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Curry v. Suarmann, Supreme Court, Nassau County 2016</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2016/curry-v-suarmann-supreme-court-nassau-county-2016/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=curry-v-suarmann-supreme-court-nassau-county-2016</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmp-law-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Superior Court Middlesex County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topofnyc.com/?p=493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict in the case of Curry v. Suarmann, Supreme Court, Nassau County 2016 – Defense Verdict – The Plaintiff and the client were involved in an intersection accident where each driver had a stop sign and alleged that the other driver ran the stop sign, causing [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2016/curry-v-suarmann-supreme-court-nassau-county-2016/">Curry v. Suarmann, Supreme Court, Nassau County 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict in the case of Curry v. Suarmann, Supreme Court, Nassau County 2016 – Defense Verdict – The Plaintiff and the client were involved in an intersection accident where each driver had a stop sign and alleged that the other driver ran the stop sign, causing the accident.  The point of impact was the front of the client’s vehicle and the passenger side of plaintiff’s vehicle.  The jury returned a verdict of no negligence on behalf of the client.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2016/curry-v-suarmann-supreme-court-nassau-county-2016/">Curry v. Suarmann, Supreme Court, Nassau County 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perotta v. Bethpage UFSD &#8211; Supreme Court Nassau County 2015</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2015/perotta-v-bethpage-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2015/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=perotta-v-bethpage-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2015</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmp-law-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 15:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Superior Court Middlesex County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topofnyc.com/?p=491</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a directed verdict in the case of Perotta v. Bethpage UFSD- Supreme Court Nassau County 2015 &#8211; Directed Verdict &#8211; Case involved a 42-yr. old woman that was present at the Bethpage HS on a Saturday for her daughter’s swim meet.  The Plaintiff alleges to have slipped and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2015/perotta-v-bethpage-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2015/">Perotta v. Bethpage UFSD &#8211; Supreme Court Nassau County 2015</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a directed verdict in the case of Perotta v. Bethpage UFSD- Supreme Court Nassau County 2015 &#8211; Directed Verdict &#8211; Case involved a 42-yr. old woman that was present at the Bethpage HS on a Saturday for her daughter’s swim meet.  The Plaintiff alleges to have slipped and fallen on ice in the parking lot on the way out of the school at 5 pm.  On the evening prior to Plaintiff&#8217;s accident it had snowed approximately 2 inches.  The school witnesses testified that on the day prior the maintainer was directed to sand/salt the lot first thing in the morning and arrived at the High School at 6:45 and performed the sanding/salting which took him about 90 minutes. The supervisor of maintenance testified that he was not scheduled to work that Saturday but visited the school at 9 am to inspect the lot.  When he got there it appeared that the sand/salt was spread around and he saw no ice. The Director of Buildings and Grounds testified that he visited the school later that day at approximately 2pm to inspect the lot because of the anticipated snow.  He also saw the salt/sand distributed around the lot and no ice in the lot.  The plaintiff testified at trial that the first time she saw the ice on the day of her accident was immediately before she fell. The Plaintiff&#8217;s husband was with her when she fell and testified that he did not see any ice on the way into the school and the first time he saw the ice was right before his wife fell. Motion for a directed verdict was granted at the close of plaintiff&#8217;s case as the court ruled that plaintiff failed to establish that the school district was on notice of the ice prior to plaintiff&#8217;s fall.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2015/perotta-v-bethpage-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2015/">Perotta v. Bethpage UFSD &#8211; Supreme Court Nassau County 2015</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A.P., infant v. Baldwin UFSD, Supreme Court Nassau County, 2015</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2015/a-p-infant-v-baldwin-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2015/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-p-infant-v-baldwin-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2015</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmp-law-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 15:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Superior Court Middlesex County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topofnyc.com/?p=489</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict in the case of A.P., infant v. Baldwin UFSD, Supreme Court Nassau County, 2015 &#8211; Defense Verdict &#8211; Plaintiff was an 8th grader on the Lawrence Junior High wrestling team.  On the day of the accident he was at Baldwin Middle School for an away [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2015/a-p-infant-v-baldwin-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2015/">A.P., infant v. Baldwin UFSD, Supreme Court Nassau County, 2015</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict in the case of A.P., infant v. Baldwin UFSD, Supreme Court Nassau County, 2015 &#8211; Defense Verdict &#8211; Plaintiff was an 8th grader on the Lawrence Junior High wrestling team.  On the day of the accident he was at Baldwin Middle School for an away meet.  It was the allegation that the mat on which the infant plaintiff was wrestling on was old and therefore would not lay flat on the gym floor causing the edges to curl up and had to be held down by volleyball poles.  It was the allegation of the Plaintiff that while he was being taken down by his opponent the sections of the mat separated causing his arm to come into contact with the gym floor.  The jury returned a defense verdict holding that the boy assumed the risk of injury by participating in the sport of wrestling and that neither the Baldwin SD nor Lawrence SD unreasonably increased the inherent risk in the sport of wrestling.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2015/a-p-infant-v-baldwin-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2015/">A.P., infant v. Baldwin UFSD, Supreme Court Nassau County, 2015</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carmelo Aponte v. Long Island Power Authority, National Grid, Cablevision Systems Corporation, Cablevision Systems Long Island Corporation, Cablevision Systems Suffolk Corporation, CSC Holdings, LLC, Verizon, Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc. and Verizon Services Court.    Supreme Court / Nassau County 2013</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2013/carmelo-aponte-v-long-island-power-authority-national-grid-cablevision-systems-corporation-cablevision-systems-long-island-corporation-cablevision-systems-suffolk-corporation-csc-holdings-llc/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=carmelo-aponte-v-long-island-power-authority-national-grid-cablevision-systems-corporation-cablevision-systems-long-island-corporation-cablevision-systems-suffolk-corporation-csc-holdings-llc</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmp-law-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Superior Court Middlesex County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topofnyc.com/?p=730</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Angelo J. Bongiorno was successful in obtaining summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint and all cross-claims against the Verizon entities. The plaintiff, Aponte, fell from a ladder while installing a new cable service line to an existing cable “tap” located on a cable strand adjacent to 12 Squaw Lane, Mastic, New York.  The plaintiff was [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2013/carmelo-aponte-v-long-island-power-authority-national-grid-cablevision-systems-corporation-cablevision-systems-long-island-corporation-cablevision-systems-suffolk-corporation-csc-holdings-llc/">Carmelo Aponte v. Long Island Power Authority, National Grid, Cablevision Systems Corporation, Cablevision Systems Long Island Corporation, Cablevision Systems Suffolk Corporation, CSC Holdings, LLC, Verizon, Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc. and Verizon Services Court.    Supreme Court / Nassau County 2013</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angelo J. Bongiorno was successful in obtaining summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint and all cross-claims against the Verizon entities.</p>
<p>The plaintiff, Aponte, fell from a ladder while installing a new cable service line to an existing cable “tap” located on a cable strand adjacent to 12 Squaw Lane, Mastic, New York.  The plaintiff was employed by Tri-Wire Engineering Solutions, Inc., as a Cable Line Technician.  He ascended the utility pole via a ladder and fell as a result of an improperly secured ladder to the cable strand.</p>
<p>The Honorable Justice Roy S. Mahon found that the sole proximate cause of the alleged occurrence was the actions of the plaintiff without any involvement or supervision by the defendants and granted defendant&#8217;s motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s claims of violations of Labor Law 240(1), 241(6) and 200 as well as plaintiff’s claims of negligence and all cross-claims against the defendants.  In addition, the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s claims of violations of Labor Law 240(1) and 241(6) was Denied.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2013/carmelo-aponte-v-long-island-power-authority-national-grid-cablevision-systems-corporation-cablevision-systems-long-island-corporation-cablevision-systems-suffolk-corporation-csc-holdings-llc/">Carmelo Aponte v. Long Island Power Authority, National Grid, Cablevision Systems Corporation, Cablevision Systems Long Island Corporation, Cablevision Systems Suffolk Corporation, CSC Holdings, LLC, Verizon, Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc. and Verizon Services Court.    Supreme Court / Nassau County 2013</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
