<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bmp-law-admin, Author at Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bmmplaw.com/author/bmp-law-admin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bmmplaw.com/author/bmp-law-admin/</link>
	<description>Attorneys At Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 20:41:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Kings County Supreme Court Grants Motion to Dismiss by BMMP&#8217;s William J. Mitchell</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2020/kings-county-supreme-court-grants-motion-to-dismiss-by-bmmps-william-j-mitchell/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=kings-county-supreme-court-grants-motion-to-dismiss-by-bmmps-william-j-mitchell</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmp-law-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 15:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court Kings County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyundai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motion to dismiss]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bmpnylaw.com/?p=1164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In Min Ru Zheng v. Hyundai Marine &#38; Fire Ins. Co., the Kings County Supreme Court found that the evidence clearly demonstrated that the plaintiff materially misrepresented the use and occupancy of the house to be insured.  The evidence showed that plaintiff had converted the house from the claimed two-family residence to a 12-family building.  Plaintiff&#8217;s [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2020/kings-county-supreme-court-grants-motion-to-dismiss-by-bmmps-william-j-mitchell/">Kings County Supreme Court Grants Motion to Dismiss by BMMP&#8217;s William J. Mitchell</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/DECISION.pdf"><em>Min Ru Zheng v. Hyundai Marine &amp; Fire Ins. Co</em>.</a>, the Kings County Supreme Court found that the evidence clearly demonstrated that the plaintiff materially misrepresented the use and occupancy of the house to be insured.  The evidence showed that plaintiff had converted the house from the claimed two-family residence to a 12-family building.  Plaintiff&#8217;s claim that the house was occupied as represented was belied by the evidence, including her earlier statements that she was unaware of the nature of the occupancy.  Upon a motion to dismiss by BMMP’s William J. Mitchell, by Order dated October 1, 2020, Hon. Karen B. Rothenberg dismissed the plaintiff&#8217;s claims.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2020/kings-county-supreme-court-grants-motion-to-dismiss-by-bmmps-william-j-mitchell/">Kings County Supreme Court Grants Motion to Dismiss by BMMP&#8217;s William J. Mitchell</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guzman v. The City of New York and Carlo Lizza &#038; Sons Paving, Inc. New York County, Successful Summary Judgment 2019</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2019/guzman-v-the-city-of-new-york-and-carlo-lizza-sons-paving-inc-new-york-county-successful-summary-judgment-2019/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=guzman-v-the-city-of-new-york-and-carlo-lizza-sons-paving-inc-new-york-county-successful-summary-judgment-2019</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmp-law-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2019 15:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court New York County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topofnyc.com/?p=604</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Aigul E. Sarvarova and Angelo J. Bongiorno were successful in obtaining summary judgement in the case of  Guzman v. The City of New York and Carlo Lizza &#38; Sons Paving, Inc. New York County.  The plaintiff, a 55-year old female, alleged that she was caused to trip and fall while walking over a recently milled [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2019/guzman-v-the-city-of-new-york-and-carlo-lizza-sons-paving-inc-new-york-county-successful-summary-judgment-2019/">Guzman v. The City of New York and Carlo Lizza &#038; Sons Paving, Inc. New York County, Successful Summary Judgment 2019</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aigul E. Sarvarova and Angelo J. Bongiorno were successful in obtaining summary judgement in the case of  Guzman v. The City of New York and Carlo Lizza &amp; Sons Paving, Inc. New York County.  The plaintiff, a 55-year old female, alleged that she was caused to trip and fall while walking over a recently milled crosswalk in downtown Manhattan.  Carlo Lizza &amp; Sons Paving, Inc. had milled the roadway several weeks prior to the accident in preparation for the resurfacing of the roadway with new asphalt by the City.  Plaintiff alleged that defendants each were negligent in creating a dangerous condition causing her injuries and failing to warn or provide safeguards at the time of the accident.  Plaintiff testified that her accident occurred in the daytime and she had no problem seeing as she was looking ahead while crossing the milled roadway. Both defendants moved separately for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.  In granting the respective defendants’ motions for summary judgment, J Lebovits held <em>inter alia</em> that the evidence showed that the milling of the roadway on which the plaintiff fell was open and obvious and that the plaintiff failed to provide any evidence creating a question of fact.  Furthermore, with respect to the City, the Court found that the City could not be sued in the absence of a prior written notice of a defective condition.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2019/guzman-v-the-city-of-new-york-and-carlo-lizza-sons-paving-inc-new-york-county-successful-summary-judgment-2019/">Guzman v. The City of New York and Carlo Lizza &#038; Sons Paving, Inc. New York County, Successful Summary Judgment 2019</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Angelo J. Bongiorno&#8217;s Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability Granted in slip and fall on snow and ice case</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2018/ofra-ruth-rodriguez-v-dominic-j-din-rabindra-nandlall-vivakanand-nandlall-deolall-nandlall-supreme-court-queens-county-2018/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ofra-ruth-rodriguez-v-dominic-j-din-rabindra-nandlall-vivakanand-nandlall-deolall-nandlall-supreme-court-queens-county-2018</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmp-law-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2018 18:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court Queens County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topofnyc.com/?p=747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Angelo J. Bongiorno was successful in obtaining summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff, Ofra Ruth Rodriguez&#8217; Complaint and all cross-claims against homeowners, Rabindra Nandlall, Vivakanand Nandlall, and Deolall Nandlall. The plaintiff, Ofra Ruth Rodriguez, claimed to have slipped and fell on snow and ice covering a sidewalk between Mr. Bongiorno&#8217;s clients’ home and the codefendant’s home.  [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2018/ofra-ruth-rodriguez-v-dominic-j-din-rabindra-nandlall-vivakanand-nandlall-deolall-nandlall-supreme-court-queens-county-2018/">Angelo J. Bongiorno&#8217;s Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability Granted in slip and fall on snow and ice case</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angelo J. Bongiorno was successful in obtaining summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff, Ofra Ruth Rodriguez&#8217; Complaint and all cross-claims against homeowners, Rabindra Nandlall, Vivakanand Nandlall, and Deolall Nandlall.</p>
<p>The plaintiff, Ofra Ruth Rodriguez, claimed to have slipped and fell on snow and ice covering a sidewalk between Mr. Bongiorno&#8217;s clients’ home and the codefendant’s home.  The plaintiff testified that on the morning of the accident it had snowed and had almost stopped when she was leaving her house.  Plaintiff conceded that there was freshly fallen snow when she slipped and fell.</p>
<p>The Honorable Frederick D. R. Sampson found that Mr. Bongiorno&#8217;s clients were exempt by NYC Administrative Code 7-210 as owner-occupied two family homeowners that exclusively use the home for residential purposes as well as that pursuant to the Storm in Progress Doctrine, defendants did not owe a duty of care, as an adequate period of time did not elapse after the snow stopped entirely.  Thus, Judge Sampson Granted the defendants&#8217; motion for summary judgment and dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint and all cross claims against homeowners, Rabindra Nandlall, Vivakanand Nandlall, and Deolall Nandlall.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2018/ofra-ruth-rodriguez-v-dominic-j-din-rabindra-nandlall-vivakanand-nandlall-deolall-nandlall-supreme-court-queens-county-2018/">Angelo J. Bongiorno&#8217;s Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability Granted in slip and fall on snow and ice case</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>S.B. infant, v. Roosevelt UFSD, Supreme Court Nassau County 2017</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2017/s-b-infant-v-roosevelt-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2017/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=s-b-infant-v-roosevelt-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2017</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmp-law-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 16:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Superior Court Middlesex County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topofnyc.com/?p=499</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict in the case of S.B. infant, v. Roosevelt UFSD, Supreme Court Nassau County 2017- Defense Verdict &#8211;  At the time of the accident the plaintiff was a high school junior and a member of the Roosevelt girls’ varsity softball team.  At that time there was [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2017/s-b-infant-v-roosevelt-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2017/">S.B. infant, v. Roosevelt UFSD, Supreme Court Nassau County 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict in the case of S.B. infant, v. Roosevelt UFSD, Supreme Court Nassau County 2017- Defense Verdict &#8211;  At the time of the accident the plaintiff was a high school junior and a member of the Roosevelt girls’ varsity softball team.  At that time there was ongoing construction and renovation at the Roosevelt High School causing the team to practice at a Uniondale elementary school.  This field was just an area of grass that looked like at one time was a little league diamond as it did have a backstop.  However, there was no longer an infield or base paths as it was entirely grown over with grass.  Both the plaintiff and the coach described the grass field as bumpy and uneven. At the first practice at the Uniondale field the coach decided to conduct base running drills.  The drill consisted of the girls running from where home plate would be, rounding the area where first base would be and then sliding feet first into an area where second base would be when the coach yelled down. The plaintiff was the first player to perform the drill and when she attempted to slide into second base her right cleat got caught in the grass causing her to fracture her ankle. It was the allegation of the plaintiff that the act of sliding in the grass unreasonably increased the plaintiff&#8217;s risk of injury as sliding feet first in the grass into a base is not a normal part of the game of softball and therefore not a risk that a player assumes in her participation in the sport. The jury returned a defense verdict finding that the Plaintiff assumed the risk of injury by her voluntary participation in the sport of softball.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2017/s-b-infant-v-roosevelt-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2017/">S.B. infant, v. Roosevelt UFSD, Supreme Court Nassau County 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michal G. Ciechorski v. The City of New York, New York City Economic Development Corporation and Hudson Meridian Construction Group, Inc. Supreme Court / New York County 2016</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2016/michal-g-ciechorski-v-the-city-of-new-york-new-york-city-economic-development-corporation-and-hudson-meridian-construction-group-inc-supreme-court-new-york-county-2016/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=michal-g-ciechorski-v-the-city-of-new-york-new-york-city-economic-development-corporation-and-hudson-meridian-construction-group-inc-supreme-court-new-york-county-2016</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmp-law-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court New York County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topofnyc.com/?p=728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Angelo J. Bongiorno was successful in obtaining summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint and all cross claims against Hudson Meridian Construction Group, LLC. The plaintiff, Ciechorski (a dock builder), alleged injuries as a result of the repetitive work activity of carrying buckets of epoxy across floating platforms to fill hollow piles driven into the Hudson [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2016/michal-g-ciechorski-v-the-city-of-new-york-new-york-city-economic-development-corporation-and-hudson-meridian-construction-group-inc-supreme-court-new-york-county-2016/">Michal G. Ciechorski v. The City of New York, New York City Economic Development Corporation and Hudson Meridian Construction Group, Inc. Supreme Court / New York County 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angelo J. Bongiorno was successful in obtaining summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint and all cross claims against Hudson Meridian Construction Group, LLC.</p>
<p>The plaintiff, Ciechorski (a dock builder), alleged injuries as a result of the repetitive work activity of carrying buckets of epoxy across floating platforms to fill hollow piles driven into the Hudson River floor.  New York City Economic Development Corporation retained defendant, Hudson Meridian, to provide construction management services for the demolition and reconstruction of Pier on East 34<sup>th</sup> Street.</p>
<p>The Honorable Justice Debra A. James agreed with Mr. Bongiorno&#8217;s argument that Hudson Meridian was not a statutory agent of the Owner, City, or General Contractor, NYC Economic Development Corporation and Granted the defendant&#8217;s motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s claims of violations of Labor Law 240(1), 241(6) and 200 as well as plaintiff’s claims of negligence and all cross-claims against Hudson Meridian.</p>
<p>The decision was Affirmed on Appeal to the Appellate Division, 1<sup>st</sup> Department, 2017.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2016/michal-g-ciechorski-v-the-city-of-new-york-new-york-city-economic-development-corporation-and-hudson-meridian-construction-group-inc-supreme-court-new-york-county-2016/">Michal G. Ciechorski v. The City of New York, New York City Economic Development Corporation and Hudson Meridian Construction Group, Inc. Supreme Court / New York County 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greson Martinez-Bonilla v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., Shleppers Holdings LLC and Steven Johnson   Supreme Court / Westchester County 2016</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2016/greson-martinez-bonilla-v-ryder-truck-rental-inc-shleppers-holdings-llc-and-steven-johnson-supreme-court-westchester-county-2016/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=greson-martinez-bonilla-v-ryder-truck-rental-inc-shleppers-holdings-llc-and-steven-johnson-supreme-court-westchester-county-2016</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmp-law-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court Westchester County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topofnyc.com/?p=737</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Angelo J. Bongiorno was successful in obtaining summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s Complaint and all cross claims against Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. The plaintiff, Greson Martinez-Bonilla, was involved in a motor vehicle accident with the codefendant, Steven Johnson, who was driving a truck owned by our client, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.  The codefendant, Steven Johnson, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2016/greson-martinez-bonilla-v-ryder-truck-rental-inc-shleppers-holdings-llc-and-steven-johnson-supreme-court-westchester-county-2016/">Greson Martinez-Bonilla v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., Shleppers Holdings LLC and Steven Johnson   Supreme Court / Westchester County 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angelo J. Bongiorno was successful in obtaining summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s Complaint and all cross claims against Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.</p>
<p>The plaintiff, Greson Martinez-Bonilla, was involved in a motor vehicle accident with the codefendant, Steven Johnson, who was driving a truck owned by our client, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.  The codefendant, Steven Johnson, was the operator of a vehicle in the course of his employment with codefendant, Shleppers Holdings LLC, who rented the truck from Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.</p>
<p>The Honorable William J. Giacomo Granted defendant&#8217;s motion for summary judgement dismissing the plaintiff’s Complaint and all cross claims against Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. on that grounds that the claims were barred by the Grave Amendment.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2016/greson-martinez-bonilla-v-ryder-truck-rental-inc-shleppers-holdings-llc-and-steven-johnson-supreme-court-westchester-county-2016/">Greson Martinez-Bonilla v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., Shleppers Holdings LLC and Steven Johnson   Supreme Court / Westchester County 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strobl v. Kellerman, Supreme Court Nassau County 2016</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2016/strobl-v-kellerman-supreme-court-nassau-county-2016/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=strobl-v-kellerman-supreme-court-nassau-county-2016</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmp-law-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 16:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Superior Court Middlesex County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topofnyc.com/?p=497</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict in the case of Strobl v. Kellerman, Supreme Court Nassau County 2016 – Defense Verdict.  The Plaintiff was a 67-yr. old female who was a front seat passenger in a vehicle that was rear ended by on the I-95.  Liability was conceded and the trial [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2016/strobl-v-kellerman-supreme-court-nassau-county-2016/">Strobl v. Kellerman, Supreme Court Nassau County 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict in the case of Strobl v. Kellerman, Supreme Court Nassau County 2016 – Defense Verdict.  The Plaintiff was a 67-yr. old female who was a front seat passenger in a vehicle that was rear ended by on the I-95.  Liability was conceded and the trial was on damages only.</p>
<p>The Plaintiff alleged that as a result of the accident she had to undergo a left total knee replacement.  The Plaintiff  was taken by ambulance from the accident to the hospital where she made complaints of bilateral knee pain.  The plaintiff treated for PT for a few months then had an unexplained 14-month gap in treatment with her orthopedist.  After beginning to treat with her orthopedist again, the Plaintiff waited another 22 months before having the knee replacement surgery.</p>
<p>The Plaintiff was morbidly obese and alleged that the 22-month gap was as a result of her having gastric bypass surgery to lose weight prior to having the knee replaced.  However, this need to lose weight prior to the surgery was not documented anywhere in her medical records.</p>
<p>The x-rays and MRI&#8217;s conducted on plaintiff&#8217;s knee showed degeneration which was also noted in the Operative Report.</p>
<p>The argument was set forth to the jury that the knee surgery was caused by a progressive deterioration as a result of her excessive weight during her lifetime coupled with her 25-yr. career as a postal worker.</p>
<p>The jury found that the knee surgery was not causally related to the accident.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2016/strobl-v-kellerman-supreme-court-nassau-county-2016/">Strobl v. Kellerman, Supreme Court Nassau County 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Curry v. Suarmann, Supreme Court, Nassau County 2016</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2016/curry-v-suarmann-supreme-court-nassau-county-2016/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=curry-v-suarmann-supreme-court-nassau-county-2016</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmp-law-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Superior Court Middlesex County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topofnyc.com/?p=493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict in the case of Curry v. Suarmann, Supreme Court, Nassau County 2016 – Defense Verdict – The Plaintiff and the client were involved in an intersection accident where each driver had a stop sign and alleged that the other driver ran the stop sign, causing [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2016/curry-v-suarmann-supreme-court-nassau-county-2016/">Curry v. Suarmann, Supreme Court, Nassau County 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict in the case of Curry v. Suarmann, Supreme Court, Nassau County 2016 – Defense Verdict – The Plaintiff and the client were involved in an intersection accident where each driver had a stop sign and alleged that the other driver ran the stop sign, causing the accident.  The point of impact was the front of the client’s vehicle and the passenger side of plaintiff’s vehicle.  The jury returned a verdict of no negligence on behalf of the client.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2016/curry-v-suarmann-supreme-court-nassau-county-2016/">Curry v. Suarmann, Supreme Court, Nassau County 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Godoy v. Central Islip UFSD, Supreme Court, Suffolk Co. 2016</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2016/godoy-v-central-islip-ufsd-supreme-court-suffolk-co-2016/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=godoy-v-central-islip-ufsd-supreme-court-suffolk-co-2016</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmp-law-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court Suffolk County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topofnyc.com/?p=495</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict in the case of Godoy v. Central Islip UFSD, Supreme Court, Suffolk Co. 2016 &#8211; Defense Verdict &#8211; The plaintiff was an 18-yr. old senior enrolled in night school in Central Islip School District.  The plaintiff was playing floor hockey during gym class with the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2016/godoy-v-central-islip-ufsd-supreme-court-suffolk-co-2016/">Godoy v. Central Islip UFSD, Supreme Court, Suffolk Co. 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a defense verdict in the case of Godoy v. Central Islip UFSD, Supreme Court, Suffolk Co. 2016 &#8211; Defense Verdict &#8211; The plaintiff was an 18-yr. old senior enrolled in night school in Central Islip School District.  The plaintiff was playing floor hockey during gym class with the gym teacher actively participating in the game.  The Plaintiff alleged that during the game the teacher went to take a slap shot and he attempted to block the shot by reaching the stick forward with his right hand.  At that time the teacher&#8217;s stick came into contact with the plaintiff&#8217;s finger causing a fracture. Slap shots are not permitted in gym floor hockey.  The teacher alleged that he did not take a slap shot but took a wrist shot from 12 ft from the goal when the ax happened.  The teacher conceded that the game got competitive, but the game never got rough. Plaintiff called an expert witness that testified that the teacher would not be able to participate in the game and adequately supervise the children in the gym class. The jury found no negligence on the part of the school district.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2016/godoy-v-central-islip-ufsd-supreme-court-suffolk-co-2016/">Godoy v. Central Islip UFSD, Supreme Court, Suffolk Co. 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perotta v. Bethpage UFSD &#8211; Supreme Court Nassau County 2015</title>
		<link>https://bmmplaw.com/2015/perotta-v-bethpage-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2015/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=perotta-v-bethpage-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2015</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bmp-law-admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 15:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Superior Court Middlesex County]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://topofnyc.com/?p=491</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a directed verdict in the case of Perotta v. Bethpage UFSD- Supreme Court Nassau County 2015 &#8211; Directed Verdict &#8211; Case involved a 42-yr. old woman that was present at the Bethpage HS on a Saturday for her daughter’s swim meet.  The Plaintiff alleges to have slipped and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2015/perotta-v-bethpage-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2015/">Perotta v. Bethpage UFSD &#8211; Supreme Court Nassau County 2015</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas A. Montiglio was successful in obtaining a directed verdict in the case of Perotta v. Bethpage UFSD- Supreme Court Nassau County 2015 &#8211; Directed Verdict &#8211; Case involved a 42-yr. old woman that was present at the Bethpage HS on a Saturday for her daughter’s swim meet.  The Plaintiff alleges to have slipped and fallen on ice in the parking lot on the way out of the school at 5 pm.  On the evening prior to Plaintiff&#8217;s accident it had snowed approximately 2 inches.  The school witnesses testified that on the day prior the maintainer was directed to sand/salt the lot first thing in the morning and arrived at the High School at 6:45 and performed the sanding/salting which took him about 90 minutes. The supervisor of maintenance testified that he was not scheduled to work that Saturday but visited the school at 9 am to inspect the lot.  When he got there it appeared that the sand/salt was spread around and he saw no ice. The Director of Buildings and Grounds testified that he visited the school later that day at approximately 2pm to inspect the lot because of the anticipated snow.  He also saw the salt/sand distributed around the lot and no ice in the lot.  The plaintiff testified at trial that the first time she saw the ice on the day of her accident was immediately before she fell. The Plaintiff&#8217;s husband was with her when she fell and testified that he did not see any ice on the way into the school and the first time he saw the ice was right before his wife fell. Motion for a directed verdict was granted at the close of plaintiff&#8217;s case as the court ruled that plaintiff failed to establish that the school district was on notice of the ice prior to plaintiff&#8217;s fall.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://bmmplaw.com/2015/perotta-v-bethpage-ufsd-supreme-court-nassau-county-2015/">Perotta v. Bethpage UFSD &#8211; Supreme Court Nassau County 2015</a> appeared first on <a href="https://bmmplaw.com">Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell &amp; Palmieri, PLLC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
